When you visit a business or an apartment complex, you expect to be safe. But what happens when you’re assaulted or robbed on the property? Can the owner be held responsible for not doing more to protect you? In many cases, yes.
Property owners have a legal duty to keep their premises reasonably safe. This duty is not limited to spills or broken stairs. It also includes foreseeable criminal acts. If a property has a known history of crime or is in a high-crime area, the owner is legally obligated to take reasonable steps to enhance security. This may include installing lighting, hiring security guards and adding surveillance cameras.
What counts as inadequate security?
There is no specific definition of inadequate security. A dimly lit stairwell, a malfunctioning entry gate or letting access codes remain unchanged after they have been compromised or a tenant moves out can all be security lapses. If the property owner knew or should have known about the potential danger based on past incidents or obvious risks, they may be held liable for not taking appropriate steps to prevent it.
What damages can victims recover?
If a court finds a property owner negligent in providing adequate security on their premises, crime victims may be entitled to damages for the harm they suffered. These can include compensation for medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering and emotional distress caused by the incident. The goal is to help victims recover physically, financially and emotionally from the impact of the crime.
Don’t assume it’s your fault
If you were injured because a property owner failed to provide reasonable security, you deserve answers. What happened to you may have been preventable. Reaching out for legal guidance can help you determine whether you have a case, understand your rights and explore the options available to hold the responsible party accountable.
Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed